【有文稿】背题库答案过了雅思,成绩作废合理吗?

【有文稿】背题库答案过了雅思,成绩作废合理吗?

2015-11-02    02'57''

主播: 英语嘚吧嘚

1317 94

介绍:
Lincoln: Chinese teachers are calling for education reforms after two incidents in which Chinese students’ international test scores were rejected. Last month, test results of over 350 Chinese students writing the Upper Level Secondary School Admission Test were rejected. Similarly, Chinese students writing the International English Language Testing System in August and September were informed last month by the British Council that their scores would be withheld indefinitely. Although the exam Test Board and the British Council have not released specific details for the refusal to accept the scores, Chinese tutoring experts suspect the decision is a result of the common Chinese practice of rote memorization of test answers in advance. We seem to be having a little interesting story here about the way Chinese students are dealing with global education systems. So, it seems like the Chinese students are not actually learning the skills, they’re just learning the answer to the test, Wu You. WY: First of all, I think this is kind of a short-term solution, even though they are memorizing the answers. What about in the future? They are actually entering into the university and they cannot talk in English fluently with their peers and their teachers, so in that case, it doesn’t really help. But I need to say, I have a different opinion about the solution, because they were saying that probably they will refuse to accept these scores. First of all, the students didn’t violate any kind of rules or regulations. They didn’t just directly copy the other people’s answers during the tests. I mean, after all, for the long term, this is not a very good action, but in the short term, this is not illegal, it is not violation of any laws, so I don’t think they should be refused. Michael: It might not be illegal, Wu You, but do you think it’s in any way immoral, you know? Or is it just perfectly legitimate gaming the system, here? WY: Even you are saying it is immoral. I think if it is obeying the rule – they didn’t violate any kind of rule, so they shouldn’t be kicked out of the game. Michael: What I find is interesting, though, is the fact that it’s Chinese teachers themselves that are calling for these reforms, so, in a sense, the teachers themselves are saying, “OK, we know that this is a problem, and we know that something needs to be done about this,” so although, as you said, Wu You, by the letter of the law they haven’t necessarily done anything wrong, it does indicate, you know, that those within the system clearly see that there’s something wrong, and that a solution needs to be found here. WY: Those teachers, they really want to help the students, because they were thinking that they are achieving the short-term goal, and it doesn’t help in the long-term, so after all, these teachers really have a very good intention. And also, if the students use this kind of method, simply by memorizing the questions and answers, even though they successfully gained the admittance into an international university or school, they would not be likely to cope with their peers and the level of English required to compete at such kind of school.
客服